Comments on: Weekly Tweets [ 2010-05-10 ] http://publishingcentral.com/blog/updates/weekly-tweets-2010-05-10 Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:45:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4 By: Jim Millar http://publishingcentral.com/blog/updates/weekly-tweets-2010-05-10/comment-page-1#comment-354 Jim Millar Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:11:26 +0000 http://publishingcentral.com/blog/updates/weekly-tweets-2010-05-10#comment-354 Bob, yes that is what I was referring to. I do think Newsweek has had a liberal bias that I just don't agree with and that they haven't always provided a balanced story. Although I see a benefit in reading publications that don't share my own bias, I still prefer to spend my time reading content that presents a more neutral approach to the subject. Bob, yes that is what I was referring to. I do think Newsweek has had a liberal bias that I just don’t agree with and that they haven’t always provided a balanced story.

Although I see a benefit in reading publications that don’t share my own bias, I still prefer to spend my time reading content that presents a more neutral approach to the subject.

]]> By: Bob McDonald http://publishingcentral.com/blog/updates/weekly-tweets-2010-05-10/comment-page-1#comment-350 Bob McDonald Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:48:53 +0000 http://publishingcentral.com/blog/updates/weekly-tweets-2010-05-10#comment-350 Thanks for the reply, Jim. Yes, I'm well aware that Newsweek has been often accused of having a "liberal" bias. I think that is what you are referring to? Truth be told, they are not really "liberal" in the original meaning of the word. But I think I understand what you mean. Nevertheless, I've still enjoyed reading it over the years. It's good to read publications that have a bias that is not the same as your own though ;) Thanks for the reply, Jim. Yes, I’m well aware that Newsweek has been often accused of having a “liberal” bias. I think that is what you are referring to?

Truth be told, they are not really “liberal” in the original meaning of the word. But I think I understand what you mean.

Nevertheless, I’ve still enjoyed reading it over the years. It’s good to read publications that have a bias that is not the same as your own though ;)

]]> By: Jim Millar http://publishingcentral.com/blog/updates/weekly-tweets-2010-05-10/comment-page-1#comment-349 Jim Millar Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:38:19 +0000 http://publishingcentral.com/blog/updates/weekly-tweets-2010-05-10#comment-349 I don't know Bob. Remember the Clinton and Lewinsky scandal? Newsweek decided not to run the story. I wonder why? I know every publication has their biases, but that was a bit much for me. Yes, it's been around a long time and I guess it's sad to see another publication hit hard times as so many seem to have in the past five years, but I don't care too much about Newsweek. But that's just me :) I don’t know Bob. Remember the Clinton and Lewinsky scandal? Newsweek decided not to run the story. I wonder why? I know every publication has their biases, but that was a bit much for me.

Yes, it’s been around a long time and I guess it’s sad to see another publication hit hard times as so many seem to have in the past five years, but I don’t care too much about Newsweek. But that’s just me :)

]]> By: Bob McDonald http://publishingcentral.com/blog/updates/weekly-tweets-2010-05-10/comment-page-1#comment-341 Bob McDonald Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:42:03 +0000 http://publishingcentral.com/blog/updates/weekly-tweets-2010-05-10#comment-341 I hope they find a buyer that will be able to revive the publication. I've enjoyed reading it all these years, and it would be sad to no longer see it on the magazine racks. But... perhaps in this digital age, it's just a sign of what's been happening and things to come. I hope they find a buyer that will be able to revive the publication. I’ve enjoyed reading it all these years, and it would be sad to no longer see it on the magazine racks.

But… perhaps in this digital age, it’s just a sign of what’s been happening and things to come.

]]>